Extract
[...] No, that is not a man, it is the very element of turmoil; intoxication and dizziness hover over it, fate . Dark genius, you frighten me Do you save, lose France? It brings the reader back into the Cordelier club by describing and restoring the history He does not describe it like a modern historian by making a table and percentages of the Cordelier club. He makes the reader dream by bringing the history to life and makes the reader understand even and escapes a little more from the base of the history. [...]
[...] History, Dictionary of Pedagogy, by F. Buisson, 1886) It is a matter of 'teaching him [the student] to render to all peoples the justice that is due to them, to broaden the horizon of his mind and, finally, to leave him, with the knowledge of his country and the state of the world, a clear notion of his duties as a Frenchman and his duties as a man?' (1890 conference) - History, an intellectual formation - History, a civic and moral formation - History, a patriotic formation but not nationalist. [...]
[...] - The Italian historian and the microhistory. A. Ginzburg, The Cheese and the Worms, the universe of a 16th-century miller (1st edition 1976 / translation 1980) How the life choices of this individual show and allow to understand the environment - Intellectual polemics and conflicts of power. One wonders what it means to be a historian It's a conquest of power like the annals and the same thing has been done by the news They did not just occupy the university institutions and the directions but they also conquered the media, newspapers etc. [...]
[...] There is joy, wit, a devilish good sense and a fine good nature in the speeches of this compatriot of La Fontaine. His political commitments will greatly mark his writings, especially in his children's manuals 'Louis XI very ugly', he will also be criticized by the Catholics Reports of The History of France According to the International Review of Education, 1895: on the images that enrich the text, 'few portraits of kings and many portraits of the leaders of modern democracy: a small Louis XI very ugly, a Louis XIV quite dull; on the other hand, a superb Gambetta and a very decorative Carnot.' According to La revue pédagogique, it is 'composed in a frankly republican and secular spirit.' - Aulard, an engaged and contested historian He will be criticized by his student Albert Mathiez because Aulard deliberately omitted certain details Divergent interpretations : According to Mathiez: 'Danton was a demagogue who was hungry for pleasures, who had sold himself to all those who had been willing to buy him . [...]
[...] He writes about events in near history, events that in his eyes have marked the Roman world; his story is situated between analysis and fact. He has a writing style alternating time, notably by making a pause, there is here an analysis of social history, it has been studied for centuries being a great historian through his style full of panache and interesting: Sallust, Conspiracy, X-XIV: 'One sees the passion for money growing first, then that for domination; and this was the cause of all that was done wrong. [...]
