Lacan, psychoanalysis, melancholy, object a, narcissism, mourning, depression, Freud, psychoanalytic theory
Unlock the complexities of melancholy and the object relation through Lacanian psychoanalytic theory. Discover how the 'object a' influences desire, narcissism, and the mourning process. Explore the distinction between melancholy and mourning, and understand the role of narcissistic love and introjection in shaping the melancholic subject's relationship with the object. Dive into the nuances of Lacan's theory and gain insights into the nature of the object in melancholy, its connection to the ego, and the implications for clinical practice.
[...] Since we are dealing with a case involving a transfer neurosis, the neurotic subject does not react entirely under the influence of the death drive. The sexual pulsional force leading him to commit incestuous acts does not overwhelm him either. Through the fantasy, he forms his own mental universe, violating acts assimilated as taboos. In other words, he will still enjoy despite the moral and psychological limitations and boundaries. Held back by the imaginary representations suggested by the unconscious, he would reduce his suicidal tendencies. [...]
[...] In order to go further in our reasoning and provide clarification to these three central questions, we will divide our work into three main parts that will constitute those of our thesis. First, the first part is dedicated to a terminological distinction between the primary psychoanalytic concepts, namely mourning and melancholy, and their relationship with the object. Next, for the second part, we will proceed to a comparative examination of the investment of the object in the two same concepts, taking into account Freud's clinical table and post-Freudian considerations. [...]
[...] The melancholic does not manage to become aware of the objectal investment given the unconsciousness of the intensity of this investment. « It could even be the case when the loss that originated the melancholy is known to the patient, who knows, in fact, what he has lost, but not what he has lost in this person. Another reason why the object's investment in melancholy is negative is due to the situation in which the ego is impoverished due to the introjection of the object and the subject judges himself negatively. [...]
[...] The subject would try to grasp his object of desire without embellishment in a 'possible suicidal raptus' since reality for him is hidden behind things and that being lucid, he can access it. This lucidity of the melancholic assumes the function of screen but distinguishes itself from the fantasizing representation consisting in hiding the objective reality. The material object does not constitute a relationship with the maternal symbolic object capable of restoring the void of disappointment. If we adopt the point of view of the melancholic, it is a matter of an object erected marking a source of inextinguishable effusion. II.1.5. [...]
[...] The melancholic, on the other hand, is unable to work through their affliction or put an end to their suffering and becomes obstructed in their psychic apparatus, and their ego becomes confused with the object. The ego asserts itself as the object itself, identifying with it unconsciously. The melancholic's object is no longer the one that is conscious and external, but rather the one that is introjected into their psyche but exists. But we do not really know what this object is. A 'pulsionnel reversal' phenomenon emerges against the ego and it identifies with the object whose nature cannot be known consciously. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee