Non-use, communication technologies, social cohesion, digital fracture, resistance to change, social inequalities, cultural resistance, ICTs, sociology, technology adoption
Reader
Abstract
Extract
of 4
Abstract
An analysis of the social and cultural implications of non-use of new technologies, exploring the reasons behind individuals' choices to reject or avoid certain technologies.
Extract
[...] Back to the theories of non-use of communication technologies, p. 335-350 - Francis Jauréguiberry (2012) - Why do some people choose not to use new technologies? - Oral Presentation of the author and the document Author : Francis Jauréguiberry Jauréguiberry" is professor at the University of Pau but also director of the SET laboratory (Society Environment Territory). In addition, he is specialized in sociology, particularly in the use and non-use of communication technologies. Source of the document: This is an article edited by Serge Proulx and Annabelle Klein at the Presses universitaires de Namur in 2012. [...]
[...] The typology of non-use and motivations A. Involuntary non-use : Digital fracture and social inequalities. - Digital fracture is a clear example of these disparities. In fact, sociodemographic variables such as age, sex, income, and education play a crucial role. - Involuntary non-use reflects inequalities in access and opportunities, exacerbating the marginalization of certain groups. B. Voluntary non-use : Cultural resistance and deliberate choices. - Certain individuals or groups deliberately choose not to use certain technologies in response to the perverse effects of generalised connectivity. [...]
[...] Francis Jauréguiberry in his article "Back to the theories of non-use of communication technologiesto explore this theme in depth. Francis shows us that non-use can be a deliberate and thoughtful choice, and not just the result of a lack of resources or access. This perspective allows us to understand the multiple motivations behind non-use, whether related to social inequalities or cultural resistance to imposed modernity. Announcement of the plan To answer this question, we will first see? I. The history and theories of non-use A. [...]
[...] New forms of resistance : Reflection on modernity and progress. - Voluntary non-use can be seen as a critique of imposed modernity and a search for alternative ways of life. By rejecting certain technologies, non-users question development models and propose more sustainable and human-centered alternatives. Conclusion : To conclude, Francis Jauréguiberry in his work reveals complex social and cultural dynamics that shape the use of ICTs. These dynamics profoundly influence our relationship with technology and modernity. Non-use, whether voluntary or involuntary, highlights crucial issues of inequality and cultural resistance. [...]
