Abstract
It can seem quite strange at first, to compare moral values and colours, for one consideres one of these two things to be acquired, as the other one seems to be in constant evolution. Blue, green or red, can be defind in nature, but goodness, cruelty or rightness are simple human qualifications made upon a precise and determined action or statement. For example, there is no feeling of cruelty when an animal eats another one, it obeys to what we call the 'law of nature', based on survival and on the logical cycle of the one animal which eats another one, ends up being finally eaten by a third animal. In nature, there are no moral values, or no feeling of morality, it is indeed a human concept, who determines the path of a society in its rightness or falsity. Both colours and moral values look like they are following a different manner to be learned and taught, what looks red will look red to an entire group of people, however what sounds good will not sound good to the exact same set of people. That is the first draft, the first thought that we encounter when we meet the subject's assertation, to see how colours and values cannot be anologuous.
