Understanding Lying According to Saint Augustine: Criteria and Moral Implications
Download
Read an extract
Themes
Saint Augustine, lying, truth, falsity, belief, intention, deception, sin, moral, Christian ethics
Reader
Abstract
Extract
of 5
Abstract
Explore Saint Augustine's nuanced analysis of lying in his 5th-century treatise, where he challenges conventional notions by distinguishing between saying something false and lying. Discover how he defines lying as having a discrepancy between one's thoughts and words, emphasizing the role of intent and belief. Learn about the moral implications of deception and the complexities of truth-telling, as Saint Augustine examines the relationship between the mind, words, and the truth. Uncover the subtleties of his argument that lying is not just about stating falsehoods, but about the desire to deceive. Dive into his work "On Lying" and gain insights into the philosophical and theological perspectives on honesty and deception.
Extract
[...] The speaker of things he holds to be true "holds as known an unknown thing" (line writes Saint Augustine. Therefore, to lie, something must occur beyond words. Saint Augustine summarizes this idea with a conclusive statement: "Thus, to lie, it is to have something in the mind, and to utter another in words, or in any signs whatsoever" (line 12-13). Lying is not the false, it is duplicity." Saint Augustine explicates this idea by the term of 'double thought' (line 14). [...]
[...] Saint Augustine closes this text with the following phrase: 'The sin of the liar is the desire to deceive by stating' (last line). As a Christian, the author characterizes lying as a sin, that of deceiving, of being in a double attitude towards one's interlocutor. This text by Saint Augustine is initially a search to understand what lying is through an attempt to circumscribe its conditions of existence. Is it enough to simply say a false thing to make us liars? [...]
[...] We will analyze the text following this problem: what criteria define lying? From the beginning of the text to "he expresses it in fact" (line Saint-Augustin tries to understand lying by focusing on the link with the true or false that it maintains. Then, from "But even if he does not lie" (line to "he knows or believes it to be false" (line he states what he has deduced from the relationship between lying and the mind. Finally, from "Where it results that one can" (line he concludes his demonstration with a moral exposition." The the first movement of the text is an attempt to expose what is problematic in the common association of the lie and the false. [...]
[...] Typical baccalaureate comment Saint-Augustin is a Christian thinker of the 5th century. In his work On lying, he condemns the act of lying by distinguishing different types of lies. The text we are studying is an excerpt from this work. The author is interested in the notion of lying, which he studies through that of truth. He questions the links between the true and the false, and challenges the idea that these two themes would simply be opposites. Saint Augustine, in fact, defends the following thesis: saying something false is not necessarily lying. [...]
[...] Lying is not the opposite of truth, the author argues. To determine what it means to lie, one must have access to the interiority of the person who speaks. Lying is the intentionality of deceiving. Saint Augustine's exposition seems to have a semantic and logical distinction as its primary concern, but it also has a strong moral charge, condemning certain behaviors. Lying ultimately appears as the act of one who has a 'double heart', the deceiver, who is in the 'sin'. [...]
