CJEU Rules Against Poland: Disciplinary Procedure for Judges Undermines EU Law Principles of Independence and Impartiality

EN P.

Order the writing of a tailor-made European law Law case

Free quote online

Law case Format .docx

CJEU Rules Against Poland: Disciplinary Procedure for Judges Undermines EU Law Principles of Independence and Impartiality

Download

Read an extract

Themes

European Commission v Republic of Poland, Court of Justice of the European Union, judicial independence, disciplinary procedure, Supreme Court, effective judicial remedy, Article 19(1) TEU, rule of law, EU values, judicial reforms, impartiality, independence of judges, National Council of the Judiciary, preliminary ruling, EU law, Treaty on the European Union, TEU, Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, TFEU, judicial protection, fundamental rights, European Union law, member state obligations, Court of Justice judgment, C-791/19, judicial accountability, disciplinary regime, judicial decisions, pressure on judges, EU Commission infringement procedure, internal legislation, EU intervention, judicial authority, national judges, right to refer, preliminary reference procedure, independence of judiciary, impartial judicial body, European Court of Justice ruling, EU judicial framework, judicial review, judicial safeguard, EU legal order, member state compliance, EU Treaty obligations, judicial cooperation, EU law supremacy, judicial protection mechanism, rule of law principle, EU fundamental values, judicial independence principle, Court of Justice of the EU jurisdiction

Reader
Abstract
Extract

Abstract

Discover the implications of the Court of Justice of the European Union's judgment in Case C-791/19, European Commission v Republic of Poland, on the rule of law and judicial independence. This landmark ruling addresses whether Poland's disciplinary procedure for judges, influenced by the executive and legislative powers, complies with the principle of effective judicial remedy under Article 19(1) of the TEU. The Court found that Poland failed to meet its EU law obligations due to the lack of independence and impartiality in its Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court. Understand how this decision impacts Poland's internal organization and the broader EU values of judicial independence and the rule of law. Learn about the European Commission's efforts to ensure member states adhere to EU principles and the significance of this judgment in the context of ongoing proceedings against Poland.

Extract

[...] The Court of Justice of the EU therefore finds that Poland had failed to comply with its obligations arising from EU law on the grounds that there would be a breach of the duty: 'of independence, impartiality of the competent judicial authority to rule on disciplinary procedures concerning them are not guaranteed'. It will assert that 'the said provisions infringe the independence of these judges, which is, at the cost of a regression of the protection of the value of the rule of law in Poland'. [...]

[...] It also does not guarantee a reasonable time limit for dealing with disciplinary cases and, finally, if a referral to the Court is made by way of a preliminary ruling, national judges may be victims of disciplinary proceedings (infringement of their right to refer a case to the Court). The question that arises here is therefore whether the establishment of a disciplinary procedure by the Supreme Court, whose judges are elected by the executive and legislative powers, respects the principle of effective judicial remedy provided for in Article 19, paragraph 1 of the TEU? [...]

[...] The nomination of the judges of the chamber proves to be in contradiction with the common values of the European Union thus the Court of Justice is therefore forced to intervene in the internal justice of the member State (II). [...]

[...] This judgment is part of the various proceedings brought by the Union against the Republic of Poland, which is accused of adopting a new disciplinary regime applicable to judges of the Supreme Court and ordinary courts that does not offer all the guarantees of impartiality and independence. The Court of Justice of the European Union has therefore been seized by the European Commission in order to establish that Poland has failed to comply with its obligations incumbent upon it, pursuant to Article 19, paragraph second subparagraph of the Treaty on the EU, as well as pursuant to Article 267, second and third paragraphs of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. [...]

docx