Legal Consequences of Moral Harassment at Work: Protections and Sanctions Under French Labour Code
Download
Read an extract
Themes
Moral harassment at work, labour code, article L. 1152-2, employee protection, sanctions against moral harassment, workplace harassment, labour law, French labour code, moral harassment definition, workplace bullying, employee rights, labour court, court of cassation, workplace discrimination, homophobic behaviors, repeated acts of harassment, vexations and humiliations, derogatory behavior, working hours modification, disciplinary procedures, moral harassment penalties, labour legislation, workplace safety, employee victim protection, employer sanctions, jurisprudence on moral harassment, labour code article L. 1121-2
Reader
Abstract
Extract
of 5
Abstract
Discover the legal consequences of moral harassment at work and understand your rights as an employee. French Labour Code Article L. 1152-2 protects victims of moral harassment, providing legal protection against dismissal and severe penalties for perpetrators. Moral harassment can take many forms, including repeated acts of psychological abuse, unjustified disciplinary procedures, and derogatory behavior. The law doesn't impose a minimum duration for moral harassment, and courts have recognized various situations as constituting moral harassment, such as fluctuating working hours, removal of responsibilities, and homophobic behaviors. Employers who engage in or tolerate moral harassment may face sanctions, but some argue that current penalties are insufficient. Learn how the law safeguards employees who report or testify against moral harassment, and understand the importance of recognizing and addressing this issue in the workplace.
Extract
[...] These penalties provided by the legislator seem severe but remain somewhat ineffective when we know that 38% of employees in companies with fewer than 200 employees would suffer from moral harassment, perhaps it would be necessary for the legislator to make the different penalties related to moral harassment at work more severe. However, France is not behind its European neighbors either, in the United Kingdom, the penalty provided in the event of harassment is only 6 months in prison. [...]
[...] The persons mentioned in the first paragraph of this article benefit from the protections provided in I and III of Article 10-1 and Articles 12 to 13-1 of Law No. 2016-1691 of 9 December 2016 on transparency, the fight against corruption and the modernization of economic life. » Marie-France Hirigoyen was a pioneer in France in highlighting the phenomenon of moral harassment. The publication of her book in 1998 marked a turning point where she states: It is possible to destroy someone just with words, looks, and implications: this is called perverse violence or moral harassment ». [...]
[...] Although the Labor Code does not precisely define what constitutes an it is up to the judges to determine, based on specific circumstances, whether the alleged behavior actually constitutes harassment. The national interprofessional agreement of March provides details on the forms of behavior that can be considered as moral harassment, notably citing abuse, threats, and repeated or deliberate humiliation in the workplace. However, a single isolated act is generally not enough to qualify a situation as moral harassment, the repetition of acts being an essential element. [...]
[...] The Legal Consequences of Moral Harassment at Work In its Article L. 1152-2 of the Labour Code, the legislator, having characterized moral harassment, has offered protection to the employee victim of moral harassment and has provided for the sanctions applicable against a person guilty of moral harassment Effective protection of the employee victim of moral harassment Article L. 1152-2 of the Labour Code provides that persons who have been subjected to or have refused to be subjected to repeated acts of moral harassment, or who in good faith have reported or testified to such acts, benefit from legal protection. [...]
[...] In doing so, the Court of Cassation clearly indicated to lower courts not to minimize moral harassment cases under the pretext that the incriminated behaviors unfolded over a relatively short period. Therefore, the question of temporality is not an element that allows characterizing moral harassment at work, thus the Court of Cassation, by many decisions, has come to determine its contours. B. A judicial determination of situations relevant to moral harassment The notion of moral harassment being a broad notion, the jurisprudence has come to specify its contours in order to be able to characterize the situations relevant to moral harassment. [...]
