Liability of Retirement Homes for Damages Caused by Residents
Download
Read an extract
Themes
Liability of another, contractual liability, retirement home responsibility, Alzheimer's disease, fault-based liability, healthcare institutions, custodianship, legal custody, responsibility for damages, Court of Cassation, contractual relationships, Blieck ruling, judicial extension, responsibility for the act of another, healthcare facilities, organization and supervision, permanent control, freedom of movement, case law, jurisprudence, civil law, tort liability, victim compensation, insurer liability, French law, 1e Civ., 15 Dec. 2011, n 10-25.740
Reader
Abstract
Extract
of 5
Abstract
Recent jurisprudence clarifies the scope of liability of retirement homes for damages caused by residents with Alzheimer's disease, highlighting the need for a thorough analysis of the specific circumstances of each case.
Extract
[...] In addition, the rejection lies in the fact that the author was housed under a contract. The appellate court had sovereignly appreciated the circumstances of fact and had established that it was not established that the author had presented an aggressive behavior towards the other residents since his arrival. In addition, nothing indicated that the facts had taken place during the scheduled surveillance periods. Therefore, the retirement home had not committed any causal fault in the occurrence of the damage. [...]
[...] 10-25.740 - Can a retirement home be held responsible for the damages caused by one of its residents to another in the context of Alzheimer's disease? Cass. 1e Civ Dec n°10-25.740, published in the Bulletin By this dismissal judgment of 15 December 2011, the 1st Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation delivers a decision on the liability of a retirement home due to its resident. In this case, a victim, a resident of the defendant retirement home, suffering from Alzheimer's disease, was struck by another resident, the perpetrator, also suffering from the same disease, during nocturnal walks. [...]
[...] He estimates that the defendant engages its responsibility in case of defective organization of the surveillance service and failure to fulfill its obligation of safety. It must implement all means to prevent the risks resulting from the freedom of movement of these patients, but it has only carried out 3 rounds out of 5 planned. Can a retirement home be held responsible for the damages caused by one of its residents to another in the context of Alzheimer's disease? The Court of Cassation rejects the appeal. [...]
[...] Thus, the establishment's liability was engaged in full right towards the victim. However, a question arises as to the scope of this jurisprudence in cases where the establishment maintains a contractual link with its boarders. Does this contractual link modify the establishment's liability in the context of the Blieck jurisprudence? B. The limitation of the application of the liability of another in contractual matters Recent jurisprudence has provided clarifications regarding the scope of liability of another in the context of contractual relationships between an establishment and its boarders. [...]
[...] However, the Court clarifies that this responsibility does not extend in the same way when the relationships between the establishment and its boarders are based solely on contractual bases. Thus, current jurisprudence emphasizes the need to carefully examine the nature of the legal links between the establishment and its boarders to determine the scope of liability of another in the contractual context. This clarification allows for a better understanding of the obligations and limits of establishments in their relationship with their residents, while ensuring a fair distribution of responsibilities in the event of damages. [...]
