The works of Jan Toorop, in the context of the Dutch art and its interpretations, is the central theme of this document. The scope of his work ranges from the 17th century to the early 20th century. The decision to retain Jan Toorop as the central theme of the assignment is attributable to two motives that are respectively of a subjective and of an objective order. As a matter of fact, the first selection criterion refers to my personal artistic preferences, whereas the second one is related to the expectations and the requirements of the course. Firstly, I have a predilection for Symbolism and Art Nouveau, which has inclined me to consider the option of adopting an artist who has taken part in one or both of these directions. My previous research work was effectuated within the framework of another class on Fernand Khnopff and on Gustav Klimt and these have lead me to look into Jan Toorop's art. His biography reveals an astonishing personality, the natural affability of whom is praised by all his contemporaries. Secondly, I have the conviction that the focus on Jan Toorop allows involving a number of theoretical questions that have been raised in class. Indeed, the stead that he occupies in Art History is ambiguous in as much as he figures at the intersection between the two previously mentioned movements. The survey of his work sheds light on the distinctions that exist between Symbolism and Art Nouveau. His career is enrooted in the context of an international artist and he actively takes part in his chosen way of life. This topic also permits to expand the horizon of the class program by offering a panorama of the forefront cultural scene of 19th century Europe.
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee