This article examines the concept of pedagogical differentiation and its practices among primary school teachers, highlighting the need for clarity in its definition and implementation.
Extract
[...] Conclusion In summary, the article constitutes an interesting study work to reflect on what pedagogical differentiation is, which, in my opinion, includes two aspects: a reflective implementation process and a set of practical tools for adapting to the characteristics of students in the classroom. It is also an interesting article to have an idea as a future teacher of the extent of the potential practices to be implemented within the classes. The article seems to me, however, to be lacunar: an approach including in its problematic the question of the inclusion of students with disabilities and the practices of differentiation would have constituted a real strong point. [...]
[...] For this, a study was conducted between 2010 and 2014, among 24 primary school teachers. This study is divided into two parts: a first part consists of semi-directed interviews to understand their understanding of the term and a second part consists of classroom observations with explanations of their practices. The results of the study reveal that there is relevance and usefulness of the concept of pedagogical differentiation for teachers. They use it according to different characteristics of students (learning style, academic and experiential acquisitions, interests, difficulties and special needs, attitudes and expectations, learning pace and autonomy of work). [...]
[...] Also, these definitions remain too vague according to them, as they do not allow for the operationalization of practices of differentiation by school staff. To know if there are pedagogical differentiation practices by teachers, the authors indicate that it is necessary to link it to the theoretical concept of intentionality, which suggests a thinking scheme and structures to analyze to understand them. B. Research Protocol It is on this notion of intentionality that they will therefore rely to well grasp how the notion of pedagogical differentiation is perceived and how it is practiced by teachers. [...]
[...] in psychopedagogy at the University of Ottawa; Naomi Grenier, a Ph.D. student in education at the University of Quebec and Charles Steichen, a graduate in education sciences start from the observation that the theoretical construct around the term pedagogical differentiation is vague. In this article, the authors engage in a clarification of the term with a first part of the article intended to return to the theoretical contributions, the second relies on a study conducted among 24 primary school teachers. [...]
[...] Interest of a Grid for Analyzing Differentiation Practices Although the concept of intentionality seems to be a pretext for the methodological structuring of the study and also allows to distinguish what belongs or not to differentiation practices (clarification or emancipation practices are different from differentiation for example), the major contribution of this article lies in the construction of a structured differentiation analysis grid in four dimensions according to the relational, temporal, instrumental, and reflective components (see Table I - page 756/757). For example: the teacher will be able to adapt their pedagogical approach, through linguistic adaptations, for students presenting difficulties during the study. [...]
