Extract
[...] In this context, Senancour's 'Oberman' stands out specifically. This novel, published in 1804, is presented in the form of a fictional correspondence where the protagonist, Obermann, confides in a friend through letters, thus exposing his deep thoughts on existence. The analysis by Pierre Bayard (2005), in his article 'How to Bore the Reader', considers 'Oberman' as a 'monument of boredom', thus questioning the novel's ability to captivate the reader's attention. Therefore, Bayard's critique prompts us to meditate on what 'Oberman' reveals about the experience of reading and how our understanding of literary boredom can influence our perception of the novel. [...]
[...] Fobula. https://www.fabula.org/ressources/atelier/?Comment_ennuyer_le_lecteur Montesquieu (1721). The Persian Letters. National Library. https://philo-labo.fr/fichiers/Montesquieu%20-%2003%20Lettres%20persanes.pdf Senancour, E. P. (1933). Obermann. School Quay, 6. https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Obermann/Texte_entier_1 Senancour, E. P. (1933). [...]
[...] Entering into such a beautiful region, I was willing to spare myself the kind of surprise of a new spectacle; I reserved it for the most beautiful hour of the day; I wanted to have it in its fullness, and without weakening the impression by experiencing it in degrees.» (E. P. Senancour, 1833). This is an example of a long and descriptive monologue that can fatigue the reader. Following the analysis of the narrative slowness of 'Oberman', we will now examine the deep existential questions that arise in the work in order to interpret their perception by the reader. [...]
[...] Senancour, 1833). However, even though they evoke profound philosophical reflections, these questions can be perceived as monotonous by some readers. The depth of Obermann's reflections, combined with a calm narrative rhythm, can give the impression of overly introspective thinking, which can lead to emotional distance or a sense of boredom in some. Consequently, even though these existential questions are essential, the way they are presented may deter a part of the audience, which can limit their ability to fully appreciate the text. [...]
[...] The current hyperconnectivity is a quest for meaning for an existential refuge, especially among the young. The subjects addressed by Senancour in 'Obermann' demonstrate their perpetual relevance and ability to spark the interest of contemporary readers, regardless of their cultural context. Senancour explores existential dilemmas that transcend temporal and geographical boundaries, offering a profound and eternal meditation on the great questions of human life. Whether in 1804 or in our 21st century, discussions on solitude, desire, and the search for meaning remain current and affect a wide audience in our modern society. [...]
