Understanding Personal Fault and Service Fault in Public Agent Liability: A Comprehensive Guide
Download
Read an extract
Themes
Public agents responsibility, personal fault, service fault, administrative law, jurisprudence, liability, indemnification, force majeure
Reader
Abstract
Extract
of 4
Abstract
Unlock the complexities of public agent responsibility with our comprehensive guide. Discover how personal fault and service fault distinctions impact liability and compensation. Learn about the principles governing public agent responsibility, including cumulation and substitution of responsibility, exoneration, and attenuation. Understand the role of jurisprudence in shaping these concepts and the consequences for public agents and administration. Dive into the nuances of fault classification and its implications for victims' rights and administrative accountability. Explore the conditions under which public agents can be held responsible or exonerated, and gain insights into the legal frameworks that govern their actions.
Extract
[...] What remains of the principle of public agents' irresponsibility? Although Portalis said that 'It is necessary to avoid that the administration's progress is stopped by legal actions., in some cases, legal actions are necessary to allow for the repair of the mistakes committed by public agents. The public agent refers to titular civil servants but also trainees, as well as agents who have signed a public law contract with the administration, such as contractual employees. Rights and obligations reflecting the values of the public service apply to them. [...]
[...] On the other hand, the public agent can rely on the act of the victim to exonerate himself from his responsibility or to mitigate it. This is, for example, the risk taken by the victim, their failure to comply with a legal obligation or their recklessness. Regardless, it is provided that the public agent may be totally or partially exonerated from his responsibility. [...]
[...] Gradually, the principle of responsibility of the State and its public agents emerged. For example, the Declaration of the Rights of Man of 1789 stated in its Article 15: "society has the right to demand an account from any public agent of its administration. The administrative regime therefore remained for a long time unsubmissive to the idea of responsibility of the public authority but also of the agents exercising it. It is therefore the maintenance (with a few exceptions) of the principle of irresponsibility that applied until the end of the Second Empire. [...]
[...] The question that arises in this case is the following: What remains of the principle of irresponsibility of public agents? In other words, are public agents irresponsible in administrative law? In order to answer this question, it is necessary to delve into the partial irresponsibility of public agents first, before analyzing, in a second time, the scope and consequences of the distinction between the different faults (II). A partial irresponsibility of public agents According to the type of fault committed, public agents can be declared responsible or irresponsible This is notably the Pelletier judgment dated July rendered by the Tribunal des conflits which highlighted the constitutive elements of the distinction between personal fault and service fault. [...]
[...] According to Laferrière, the service fault, unlike the personal fault, "reveals an administrator more or less prone to error. If the agent's fault does not present the characteristics of personal fault, it is then qualified as service fault. In fact, service fault can manifest itself through a lack or poor organization of the service. Furthermore, it may not be an individual fault but a collective fault as specified by the Council of State convened in assembly on April (Papon decision). [...]
