Annulment of Marriage Between Step-Father and Step-Daughter: Compatibility with ECHR Articles 8 and 12 - Court of Cassation Ruling Analysis

EN P.

Order the writing of a tailor-made Family law Law case

Free quote online

Law case Format .docx

Annulment of Marriage Between Step-Father and Step-Daughter: Compatibility with ECHR Articles 8 and 12 - Court of Cassation Ruling Analysis

Download

Read an extract

Themes

Right to respect for private and family life, Article 161 Civil Code, annulment of marriage, European Convention on Human Rights, Article 12 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR, Court of Cassation, Court of Appeal, nullity of marriage, disproportionate infringement, marriage law, family law, human rights law, ECHR case-law, right to marriage, private life, family life, Civil Chamber 1, Court of First Instance, cassation appeal, reinforced guardianship, step-daughter, ex-wife, family ties, incest, blood ties, European Court of Human Rights, B and L/United Kingdom, case-law, jurisprudence, marriage nullity, legal proceedings, guardian, curator, procedural law, civil law, French law, Civil Code, law of marriage, family relationships, step-family, marriage duration, sovereign discretion, appeal judgment, damages claim, children, stepmother, family conflict, legal dispute, human rights violation, proportionality test, interference with private life

Reader
Abstract
Extract

Abstract

Unlock the insights of a landmark court ruling on marriage annulment and human rights. Discover how the Court of Cassation navigated the complexities of Article 161 of the Civil Code, the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and the delicate balance between the right to marriage and respect for private and family life. This case summary explores the court's decision regarding the annulment of an 8-year marriage between a man and his former step-daughter, raising crucial questions about proportionality, infringement, and the interpretation of human rights law. Dive into the details of the Court of Appeal's ruling, the grounds of the cassation appeal, and the Court of Cassation's final verdict, shedding light on the legal intricacies and implications for individuals and families.

Extract

[...] Based on Article 161 of the Civil Code, the Court of Appeal holds that Mrs. Z lived as a minor for 9 years with Pierre who was her stepfather and appeared as a symbolic paternal reference, that the marriage lasted only 8 years, that there were no children born in this marriage, and that therefore the annulment of the marriage did not constitute a disproportionate infringement of Article 8 of the ECHR, which protects the right to private and family life. [...]

[...] Z was placed under reinforced guardianship, her guardian has since intervened in the proceedings. Mrs. assisted by her guardian, having lodged an appeal against the judgment rendered by the Court of First Instance before the Court of Appeal of Aix-en-Provence, the latter rendered a ruling on December which pronounced the nullity of the marriage." Mrs. Z and her guardian then filed a cassation appeal. Grounds of the Court of Appeal: The Court of Appeal pronounces the nullity of the marriage and rejects the claim for damages. [...]

[...] Court of Cassation, Civil Chamber December 2016, n° 15-27.201 - The Formation of the Couple - Case Summary Court of Cassation, chamber civil 1 8 December 2016 No. of appeal: 15-27201 Facts: Pierre X married Mrs. Z on April the latter being his former step-daughter, the daughter of his ex-wife born from a first union. The latter was 9 years old at the time of the marriage between Pierre X and her mother, Mrs. and 27 years old at the time of her marriage to Pierre X. Procedure: The children of Mr. X have brought an action against the death of their father, Mrs. [...]

[...] Problem of law: Does the annulment of an 8-year marriage between a man and the daughter of his ex-wife constitute an excessive infringement of the right to respect for private and family life? Solution of the Court of Cassation: The Court of Cassation rejects the appeal lodged by Madame Z and her curator. The Court of Cassation considers that no infringement of the right to marriage based on Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights is constituted as long as the marriage was celebrated and lasted until the death of Pierre X. [...]

docx