Tax administration right of reprise, income tax, corporate tax, article L169 LPF, tax return, tax period, tax recovery, article L277 LPF, payment deferment, tax verification duration, article L52 LPF, simplified tax regime, on-site verification, tax fraud, fraudulent manoeuvres, article L10 LPF, tax surcharge, tax penalties, article 1729 CGI, deliberate failure, tax code, tax procedure, Meyer jurisprudence, Council of State, CE 2 October 2002, article L47 LPF, formal requirements, verification notice, tax control, tax dispute, departmental tax commission, administrative tribunal, article L199 LPF, article R1901 LPF, complaint procedure, tax sanction, article 1741 CGI, tax evasion, concealment of income, fraudulent intent, Court of Cassation, 22 June 2011 ruling, tax law, tax litigation, France tax authority, tax legislation, tax regulation, tax compliance, tax audit, tax inspection, tax penalty, tax fine, imprisonment for tax fraud, tax reputation damage, tax charter, taxpayer rights, tax assistance, tax guarantee, surety, hypothec, tax payment delay, tax recovery procedure, tax administration control, tax declaration, tax assessment, tax evaluation, tax jurisdiction, tax court, tax appeal, tax contestation, tax litigation procedure.
"Unlock the intricacies of tax administration procedures and understand your rights as a taxpayer. Discover how the tax administration's right of reprise is exercised within a three-year timeframe, as per Article L.169 of the LPF, and learn about the conditions for contesting tax recovery and requesting payment deferment under Article L.277. Explore the limits of on-site verification duration and the implications of tax fraud, including penalties and fines. Get insights into the taxpayer's appeal process and the tax administration's authority to control undeclared income. Stay informed about your obligations and the consequences of non-compliance, ensuring you're equipped to navigate complex tax procedures with confidence."
[...] The 12 April 2023, the verification begins and it ends on 10 June 2024, so it 14 months later. The hairdresser wants to have an answer to several of his questions. Is the accounting verification procedure regular, and what means does he have to delay or contest the recovery of the sums? I. The regularity of the procedure - Obligations and guarantees of the taxpayer In law, article L.47 of the LPF provides that balance sheet audit or a balance sheet examination cannot be initiated without the taxpayer having been informed by the sending or delivery of a verification notice or by the sending of a balance sheet examination notice? [...]
[...] In addition, the administration exercised its right to request additional informal information based on the article L.10 LPF, this is perfectly in line with the procedureprocedure. It is not yet a formal check, but a simple preparatory step. Finally, the jurisprudence Meyer does not seem not applicable here : it concerns cases of trisspecific cases, including in matiisre concerns bank accounts abroad and legal security. The case of Mr. ALAVOINE concerns undeclared income in France, without exceptional circumstances or abusive behavior from the administration. [...]
[...] The possibility of delaying the effects of recovery In law, article L.277 of the LPF allows the taxpayer to contest the recovery and request a payment deferment, under two conditions: on the one hand, he must contest the taxation, and on the other hand, he must offer guarantees such as a surety or a hypothecisthat. In the spaceisThis, Mr. not being in agreement with the correction, can therefore file a complaint and request a payment stay, provided that a valid guarantee is provided. This request would allow him to suspend the payment pending the examination of the dispute.and. III. The taxpayer's appeal In law, article R*190-1 of the LPF states that 'the taxpayer who wishes to contest must submit a complaint to the territorial service within a period of 2 months from the notification'. [...]
[...] He receives a letter on 9 February 2024 from the tax administration, relying on article L.10 LPF, and questions the regularity of the procedure and the application of the case law Meyer. To what extent can the tax administration control income and initiate a procedure despite the long time elapsed? I. The tax administration's right of reprise In law, article L.169 of the LPF states that "For income tax and corporate tax, the tax administration's right of reprise is exercised until the end of the third year following the end of the tax period to which the tax return relates."third yearthe year following that to which the tax is due. [...]
[...] Thus, in accordance with this article, the administration has the possibility of intervening in 2024 for revenues received in 2021. In the spaceisthis, M. Alavoine has received his revenues in 2021, and declared them in 2022. The right of recovery of the administration therefore goes untilto the 31st ofisDecember 2024. The letter received on February 2024 so it is perfectly within the legal deadline, and no prescription can be invoked. II. The request for justification In addition, Article L.10 of the same code provides that 'The tax administration controls the declarations as well as the acts used to establish taxes, rights, taxes and fees.' The third paragraph of this article adds that 'it may request taxpayers all information, justifications or clarifications related to the declarations subscribed or to the acts deposited's. » Finally, the Meyer jurisprudence of October comes to limit the right of recovery in the event of accounts to the éforeigner non declared and targets the necessitit is for the administration to act within reasonable deadlines. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee