Admissibility of Clandestine Recordings as Evidence in Civil Liability Cases Under French Law
Download
Read an extract
Themes
Clandestine recording, civil liability, Article 1240 Civil Code, right to respect for private life, proof of fault, lease contract, electronic writing, probative force
Reader
Abstract
Extract
of 6
Abstract
Unlock the power of evidence in legal proceedings with our comprehensive guide. Discover how clandestine recordings, electronic exchanges, and digital documentation can be used to establish fault, prove contractual obligations, and facilitate the pursuit of justice. Learn about the admissibility of evidence obtained through unconventional means and the conditions under which they can be considered valid in court, as per the French Civil Code and European Convention on Human Rights. Understand the nuances of proving obligations, discharging debts, and the probative force of electronic writing in a legally binding context.
Extract
[...] Thus, the Cour de cassation, meeting in plenary session on December No. 20-20.648, enshrined the principle according to which a rule of evidence, even contractual, can be set aside when it disproportionately affects the right to evidence, by making its administration excessively difficult. In this case, the disputed clause requires the insured to produce three concordant expert opinions, carried out at their own expense, to establish the reality of the accident. Such a requirement imposes a particularly heavy burden on Maïté, both financially and practically, and conditions all compensation on a unique and costly mode of proof. [...]
[...] The damage is composed of the water infiltrations that affected Maïté's apartment and the repair costs incurred. The causal link is direct, since the leak coming from the neighbor's apartment is the immediate cause of the water damage suffered by Maïté. The neighbor contesting any responsibility, the contentious recording is the only means of establishing the existence of the fault, which is a necessary condition for the engagement of civil liability on the basis of Article 1240 of the Civil Code. [...]
[...] Maïté is therefore entitled to rely on the exception provided for by Article 1360 of the Civil Code. She has, in this regard, the police book of the company, a legally kept register by professionals in the trade of second-hand goods, in which the price of ?20,000 is mentioned on October as well as the testimony of her assistant confirming the agreement reached with the buyer on that date. These elements constitute admissible and concordant means of proof. Therefore, Maïté is entitled to provide proof of the existence and content of the addendum by any means and can validly obtain payment of the ?5,000. [...]
[...] 20-20.648, the Cour de cassation held that evidence obtained in a disloyal manner may be admitted when two cumulative conditions are met: on the one hand, the evidence must be 'essential to the exercise of the right to evidence'; on the other hand, the infringement caused by the production of the evidence must be 'proportionate to the conflicting interests at stake', which requires a weighing of the interests involved. In addition, in accordance with Article 1240 of the Civil Code, 'any act whatsoever of man, which causes damage to another, obliges the one by whose fault it occurred to repair it'. The engagement of civil liability thus requires the conjunction of a fault, a damage and a causal link, the proof of the fault constituting an essential condition of the action. [...]
[...] On the proof of the neighbor's fault by a clandestine recording Maïté and her husband wish to engage the civil liability of their neighbor on the basis of Article 1240 of the Civil Code, by producing a recording of a conversation in which he acknowledges the existence of a leak coming from his apartment and its faulty origin. However, this recording was made without the neighbor's knowledge. Can a recording made without a person's knowledge be validly produced in court to establish their fault on the basis of Article 1240 of the Civil Code? In principle, proof must be loyal. [...]
