Abstract
Inside the group, each person has the same "level? of importance. The three of us had a common objective in analysing as many stocks as possible. During the semester we analyzed between 30 to 50 stocks each. Concerning the decision-making, the stock was presented by the member who analyzed it for the rest of the group. For our trade, the decision of entering or closing a position was made only if the entire group agreed on the stock, on the stop loss, on the exit target, etc. We adopted this process mainly because we noticed that it was not difficult to persuade one member whereas it was difficult to convince two of them. Furthermore, the criticisms and the confrontation of our ideas were more virulent and pertinent within the three member group. About the stocks analyses, in order to simplify their understanding and to optimize the communication, we decided to adopt the same tools and settings (color) as well as the same methodology to identify attractive stocks and to analyze them.
