Accessibility, Disability, Public Spaces, Employment Discrimination, User Experience, Case Studies
This document explores the challenges faced by individuals with disabilities in public spaces, highlighting obstacles to accessibility and employment. It delves into case studies of users with motor and visual impairments, analyzing their experiences and interactions with employees and technicians.
[...] Barriers to the Integration of People with Disabilities Activity Accessibility in Public Spaces - Obstacle Visual indication only + only the parking lot is accessible to people with reduced mobility - Obstacle Visual traffic light only - Obstacle Absence of sidewalk (presence of car) - Obstacle Push/Pull door (and not sliding sideways) - Obstacle Stairs - User Motor-impaired, people with reduced mobility in a wheelchair. - User Motor-impaired, visually impaired or blind person - Obstacle USER B as he cannot read the sign and find the right direction - Obstacle USER B as he cannot know when the traffic light is red for vehicles and therefore green for him. [...]
[...] The employee judges in advance based on clichés. - Key word: Trust (value at the foundation of the integration of people with disabilities and equality among all employees) The integration of people with disabilities and their access to the labor market are hindered by two obstacles: - Less diplomas: this lower level of qualification often prevents them from accessing the labor market - Little effort from companies in integrating disabled candidates: yes, there are initiatives for disability (quotas) for company communication and image, but they are not really put in place afterwards. [...]
[...] - Yes and no: yes because the employee has the right to be in an urgent situation and need someone to resolve their situation (justified call if, and only if, there is a professional emergency, for example with a client or supplier). And no this call is no longer justified once the technician has entered the room. The suspicious and stereotype-filled questions, which are asked by the employee to 'reassure' themselves and express their discontent out loud, are unnecessary and in no way benevolent towards the technician. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee