This text is an article written which was written last year by two scholars, Jing Guo and Neil Gilbert, in the Journal of Sociology and Social welfare. In this article, they compare the social policies implemented by governments in Europe to increase gender equality and the attitudes of citizens toward gender equality in terms of access to labour market and family life. Their aim is to show that generally, there is a relation of coherence between both attitudes (on the part of governments and on the part of the population).
This article studies such relationship in the current context of economic crisis that we are currently going through. This is, in my opinion, one of the strengths of this article: it is recent so it is difficult to call into question its suitability. This article is well-presented, in a linear approach which makes easier to understand the point the authors want to make.
First, the authors explain that typologies have already been elaborated to compare welfare regimes in Europe but they did not focus enough on the importance of gender equality. For instance, Esping-Andersen identified three welfare regimes (Social democratic, conservative and liberal) but his approach drew on income transfer for male breadwinners.
The feminist dimension was brought by Sainsbury, in order to understand gender inequalities and variations in terms of social policies across Europe. For example, he explained that Scandinavia was dual-breadwinner model which facilitate full employment to both men and women. The first important part of the article is a summary of gender policy typologies already elaborated in alternative to the first one created by Esping-Andersen. The authors consider there are three main typologies which overlap each other.
The first one was made by Lewis who considered we could distinguish countries according to their breadwinner model. First, some countries such as Great-Britain have a strong male-breadwinner model which does not ensure equal opportunities in gaining access to the labour market for men and women.
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee