Extract
[...] When there is a denial of justice, the bailli can render justice in place of the prévô > At the base, in order to fulfill their mission, the bailiffs are not sedentary at the chief town, they move around, they are there where There are files. The bailiff moves around with people. He asks the prevot to come, to the neighboring prevots, to the justiciars and to the justice assistants. For the most serious files, it is the bailiffs who move directly. Gradually, the bailiff becomes sedentary. II- The Central Jurisdiction The King's Court (court of the king) > DisIn the early times of the Capetian dynasty, the king had taken the habit of rendering justice in person. [...]
[...] Appeal of false judgment > This appeal route is particularlyisbecause one can take the judge to task, whom the litigant accused of having knowingly rendered a false judgment. Reserved to the noble, it will result in a singular combat, a judicial duel, which takes place before the court of the superior lord, and following the outcome of the combat, judgment is maintained or annulled. Appeal by error of pleading > Appearsit in Normandy in the XIIIisme. Appeal based on the error of the first judge. [...]
[...] He takes an opinion but renders the sentence he then decides. Transformation of this curia regis (king's court) > At the moment où la féodalité va disparaître, au XIVème, under the monarchy called 'tempered' », la curia rgis disparait, but it will leave its place to something else, and its judicial attributions will give rise to two institutions : - le collège des pairs (ancient feudal court) - The parliament (it subsists to the royal court) 1. The peers of France > They existed before the XIVisme, they form in the XIIisme ifisclear in collectionisge of 12 members members lacs members eccleschatological) they are beside the king > These are the Dukes of Burgundy, of Normandy, the Count of Flanders, the Counts of Champagne, of Toulouse. [...]
[...] However, there are exceptions to this accusatory procedure principle : - Flagrant delit = no problem with evidence so judgment will take place on simple declaration of those who arrested the culprit no complaint from the victim but public rumor designates the culprit, trs insistent. In this hypothesis.if, it is said that there is an arrest, namely that the lord seizes the presumed culprit. The nurse locks him up'accusand invites him to pronounce. He can keep him for a year and a day, and if no pronouncement is made, he will be released, often banishing him from the lordship. Evidence and avenues of appeal 1. [...]
[...] For example, one had a lord who concisof a land, a fief, and this superior lord to that who obtained the fief, can grant the land and retain the right of justice Not systematic but it can happen, d'ù theadage « fief, jurisdiction and justice have nothing in common ». Sometimes, there may also be a fief by a lord or another exercises the right of justice. Customs do not go in this sense, example of Anjou 'fief and justice is all one'" ». The compthe essence of seigneurial jurisdictions > L'the extent of seigneurial jurisdictions varied; one can distinguish high and low justice. [...]
