Impact of the Hesychast Crisis on Byzantine Society and Politics in the 14th Century
Download
Read an extract
Themes
Byzantine Empire, Hesychast crisis, Orthodox Christianity, Gregory Palamas, Constantine I, John V Palaeologus, John VI Cantacuzenus, Eastern Roman Empire, Ottoman invasions, Christian spirituality
Reader
Abstract
Extract
of 4
Abstract
Discover the profound impact of the Hesychast crisis on the Byzantine Empire, a pivotal moment in history where spirituality and politics intersect. This 14th-century religious movement, rooted in Orthodox Christianity, sought a deeper union with God through continuous prayer and love, influencing every aspect of Byzantine society. Led by figures like Gregory Palamas, Hesychasm became a widespread spiritual awakening, shaping the empire's social and political landscape. Understand how this crisis, amidst the Ottoman threat and internal divisions, contributed to the weakening of the Byzantine Empire's unity and left lasting repercussions on its society and religion. Explore the intricate relationships between the Church and State, and how emperors navigated the complex theological debates, ultimately shaping the course of history.
Extract
[...] In our context, we are faced with an empire ruled by an emperor holding absolute and unshared power, who must face numerous economic, political, or military pressures related to the intrusion of the Ottomans, who continue to gradually extend their domination and influence over Constantinople. The accession of John V to the throne, then 9 years old, initially engages a complex political situation, with a disputed regency between John Cantacuzenus and Patriarch John Calcas, who ultimately accedes to the throne through a coup d'état. In addition to this, a religious crisis also traverses the Byzantine Empire: that of Hesychasm. [...]
[...] Thus, many changes take place: we have, for example, a return to the past of the office, monastic rules then replaced by a synthetic liturgical tradition developed on the basis of the Sabaitic monastic tradition, new solemnities introduced into the cycle of Lent, or a fast observed in a more rigorous way. This movement is accompanied by a perception of prayer as a universal practice, with centrality and importance given to the universal conception of salvation through the prayer of the heart, but which is not to everyone's taste. Indeed, the emergence of such changes leads to many divisions within the Byzantine Church, between supporters and opponents of these practices. [...]
[...] The consequences on the religious level are therefore very profound and followed by intense theological and spiritual debates that leave a lasting mark within the Byzantine Empire and its development. III/ A theological dispute contributing to the fragility of the Empire Finally, we cannot fail to refer to the political consequences of these religious and social quarrels that continue to aggravate civil discord. The religious struggles, born of age-old hostility, continue to increase the disarray of the emperors who attempt to reunify the Church. [...]
[...] A spirituality that was then more intellectualized and disembodied is presented, which directly collides with the will to praise a spirituality coming from the heart in the following century: it is the arrival of the 'hésychasme. The figure of the hesychast then enters the religious landscape with the aspiration to circumscribe the incorporeal in a heart of flesh. Prayer is now takes place with the heart, and becomes an instrument in the service of an uninterrupted communication with God. Thanks to great figures, such as Gregory Palamas, this spiritual movement becomes popular between the 12th and 14th centuries, making hesychasm a spiritual awakening affecting all aspects of Byzantine social and political life. [...]
[...] Ultimately, this crisis directly weakened the unity of the Byzantine Empire and had lasting repercussions on the society and religion of the time. Thus, while some emperors such as John V Palaeologus initially supported the Hesychasts and promulgated certain decrees in their favor; others, such as John VI Cantacuzenus, attempted to find a compromise between the two camps by promoting theological discussion. However, some emperors like John XI Palaeologus persecuted the Hesychasts and attempted to eliminate them. Ultimately, the management of the dispute by the emperors was directly influenced by political, theological, and personal factors, which contributed to the complexity of the situation. [...]
