This document explores the notion of power representation within the Abbasid caliphate, examining the importance of protocol and ceremonial in the exercise of power. Drawing on historical accounts and testimonies, it provides a nuanced understanding of the complexities of power and its representation in medieval Islam.
Extract
[...] Therefore, to what extent does the author's testimony nourish a reflection on the importance of power representation within the framework of its exercise within the Abbasid caliphates? In order to address this problem, we will first see the framework that allows for this representation, and then the performative tools used by the Abbasid institutions. I. The notion of power representation within the Abbasid caliphate Within the framework of this testimony, we note that the notion of power is linked to objects that directly affect the sense of power, or even superiority, which is not unique to the Abbasid caliphate. [...]
[...] The caliph: a representation of his power in a protocol manner The Abbasid institutions also use the notions of protocol to formalize power and anchor it in precise rites. In fact, the caliph has a raised place on a throne. The author mentions a « tradition » within chapter IV, but we note here the importance of protocol as a means of highlighting the caliph. The clothes worn by the latter also give rise to an important representation of his position. The importance of religion is translated through the objects used and worn by the caliph. [...]
[...] Through a re-reading of the writings of Abd Alla?h al-Baghda?di? made possible by the translation work of the historian Dominique Sourdel, a part of the memory of medieval Islam is transmitted to us within the section The Book of Secretaries. From then on, the study of a part of this Bulletin of Oriental Studies Account of the institutions of the Sunni Caliphate of the Abbasid dynasty. The proposed document is divided into two parts, each corresponding to one of the chosen chapters, namely chapters 1 and 4. [...]
[...] Furthermore, no negative information is given about the exercise made by the caliph of these ceremonies? What view did the sovereign have of these protocols and rites? Unfortunately, we have no possibility of exact interpretation of this protocol, although it may allow us to understand how the notion of power and its representation were articulated in the context of medieval Islam, as permitted by this testimony. Finally, a cross look with the representation of power under other cultures and political regimes can allow us to detect similarities. [...]
[...] This importance of the representation of power, but also the places where power is exercised, is part of the continuity of Western heads of state, as can be seen through the exercise of power by French King Louis XIV. III. Criticism of the document The document format does not give importance to the limits of the highlighting of power. In fact, the testimony is not neutral and objective, but is inscribed in a different perspective: it paints the portrait of the sovereign. [...]
