The Consequences of Modernity by Anthony Giddens: Understanding Discontinuities
Download
Read an extract
Themes
Modernity, discontinuity, social sciences, post modernity, grand narratives, Anthony Giddens, sociology, social change, global influence
Reader
Abstract
Extract
of 4
Abstract
Anthony Giddens' seminal work, The Consequences of Modernity, challenges conventional understandings of modernity and its trajectory. In the first part of the book, Giddens introduces the concept of discontinuities of modernity, arguing that traditional notions of linear progress and grand narratives are no longer tenable. He contends that the social sciences have become mired in creating new terminology to describe modernity and post-modernity, but to little avail. Instead, Giddens advocates for a new perspective that focuses on individual experiences and the rapid changes that characterize modern life. By abandoning the idea of a predictable, linear evolution, Giddens' work offers a nuanced understanding of modernity as a complex, dynamic, and inherently uncertain phenomenon. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, Giddens' insights into the transformations of our existence provide a timely and thought-provoking exploration of the nature of modernity.
Extract
[...] What he really wants is for us to adopt a 'new way of seeing' modernity, a vision with discontinuities. So, he gets down to business: modern society does not follow a straight line of peaceful evolution. We need to learn to see the breaks, the ruptures, the moments where things don't follow as planned. Personally, I'd say Giddens is right to shake up the sociologists a bit. The world is chaotic, we don't have all the answers, and that forces us to question our certainties. [...]
[...] - When he talks about 'security and danger', I think about my own life. I mean, between the betrayals, scandals in my city, and neighborhood dramas, security is a total illusion. What does he mean by 'the founding fathers of sociology privileged the good side'? They must not have lived in my city then, because here, you have to be ready for anything, all the time. You can never really feel safe, even when everything seems perfect. So, modernity or not, I'm staying on my guard. I don't trust anyone. [...]
[...] What he proposes is to go back to a new way of seeing things: a 'discontinuous' view of modern social history. He tells you in short that you have to give up the idea that we are in a linear evolution and that everything is predictable. Nope What's happening is more chaotic and fragmented. Finally, he explains to you that his goal is to define what modernity is with these 'discontinuities', these breaks that make everything not necessarily chain together as before. [...]
[...] He talks about the 'transformation of our existence' and I think the real transformation is when you go from a 10 million dollar house to a 20 million dollar house. And seriously, is anyone really concerned about these 'social systems' as long as their meal is served on time? I agree that there are changes, but it's not these 'philosophical ruptures' that interest me. What I see is that you have to adapt to everything, all the time. Fashion changes, expectations change, people change. And if you don't keep up, you get left behind quickly. [...]
[...] And this story about urbanization transforming everything, we already see it in our lives. It's not just streets or buildings that change, it's people who become more sneaky, more manipulative. The 'modern social forms' he talks about are just another way of saying that everyone has secrets and you have to watch your back. A bit disheartening, but utopia doesn't exist, not even in upscale neighborhoods. My solution, once again, would be: adaptation to survive in a world where everything can change at any moment, including people. [...]
