Abstract
It can seem quite strange to compare moral values and color, for one consideres one of these two things to be acquired, as the other one seems to be in constant evolution. Blue, green or red, can be defind by nature, but goodness, cruelty or rightness are simple human qualifications made upon precise and determined actions or statements. For example, there is no feeling of cruelty when an animal eats another one, it obeys what we call, the 'law of nature', based on survival, and on the logical cycle that the animal which eats another one, ends up being finally eaten by a third animal. In nature, there are no moral values, it is a human concept. Both color, and moral values look like they are following a different manner, to be learned and taught, what looks red will look red to an entire group of people; however what sounds good will not sound good to the exact same set of people. That is, the first draft, the first thought that we encounter when we examine the subject's assertation, that it is impossible to see how colors and values could be analogous.
