Pierre Corneille, The Liar, comedy, fiction, imagination, poet, lying, theater, meta-theatrical, speech, invention, Dorante, Clarice, Lucrèce, social order, morality
Explore how Corneille's The Liar transforms the concept of lying into a creative activity, blurring the lines between fiction and reality.
[...] The pleasure of the story takes precedence over prudence. In this, he approaches the artistic creator, who invents out of a taste for beauty and admiration. The spectator himself is caught in the trap of this verbal seduction. Like the audience of a poem or a play, he knows that what he hears is false, but willingly accepts the illusion. Corneille thus makes Dorante an ironic double of the playwright: both invent fictions to produce pleasure and meaning. However, Dorante's fictions are not without effects. [...]
[...] Through him, Corneille highlights that fiction, when it substitutes for reality without the consent of others, ceases to be an art and becomes a fault. By making Dorante a lying poet, Corneille proposes a broader reflection on the power of speech and fiction. The theater itself is based on an accepted lie: the spectator knows that they are attending an illusion, but chooses to believe in it. Dorante, on the other hand, imposes his fictions on a world that is not aware of the rules. [...]
[...] However, this assimilation of the liar to the poet is not without ambiguities or limits. We can therefore ask to what extent Corneille's comedy transforms the liar into a creator of fictions. We will first see that Dorante behaves as a poet of the word, before analyzing the moral and social limits of this fictional creation, and then show that Corneille questions, through Dorante, the power and dangers of invention. Dorante stands out from the start with his unique relationship to language. He lies with ease, elegance, and inventiveness. [...]
[...] Thus, The Liar becomes a meta-theatrical comedy: it questions the conditions under which fiction is legitimate. The poet is the one who creates within a recognized framework, while the liar transgresses this framework. The denouement, marked by the admission and the return to the truth, recalls the necessary limits of invention. Dorante must renounce his fictions to regain a place in society. Corneille does not condemn the imagination, but channels it: fiction is precious, provided it is assumed as such. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee