Judicial review, regulatory authorities, administrative law, legal oversight, governance, regulatory compliance, administrative justice
This document outlines the effectiveness of judicial review mechanisms implemented by regulatory authorities, providing an introduction and detailed plan for assessing their impact.
[...] Control exercised by the judge and by particular bodies that are the regulators. At the starting point, this concept of regulation is very linked to the universal service. Regulatory authorities perform important functions: consultative, normative, contentious, and injunctive. These functions can have significant impacts on individuals or businesses subject to them. That is why it is necessary to question the effectiveness of the control put in place by regulatory authorities. The development of control of the acts of regulatory authorities A. [...]
[...] ART power to regulate conflicts) always subject to the control of the Council of State (subsidiary) II- A strict and protective control of the Council of State of individual rights A. A strict regime for contentious sanctions - On the contentious sanctions: pecuniary, authorization, restrictions? - Council of State proceeds to a a thorough check and must verify that the sanction has no effective character - Heavy litigation for the ARCOM v. CNEWS: ends with a CEDH ruling in 2023 (C8 v. [...]
[...] What is the effectiveness of the judicial review mechanism put in place by regulatory authorities? - Introduction and detailed plan Judicial Review of Regulatory Authority Actions Regulatory authorities, such as the Competition Authority or the Financial Markets Authority in France, exercise significant powers in various fields such as competition, finance, or communications. When an individual or a company feels harmed by a decision made by one of these regulatory authorities in an unfair and/or illegal manner, they can bring the administrative judge to contest this decision. [...]
[...] France) end of litigation v. sanctions following the chain's shortcomings. Council of State: requires honesty obligations to apply to information and entertainment broadcasts. The European judge of human rights reinforces the ARCOM's approach and confirms the proportionality of sanctions due to repeated shortcomings. B. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee