Civil Liability, Delictual Liability, Contractual Liability, Damage, Fault, Causality, Personal Fault, Liability for Others, Liability for Things, Civil Code, Tort Law
Reader
Abstract
Extract
of 85
Abstract
This document outlines the principles of civil liability, including delictual and contractual liability, and the conditions required for liability to be established.
Extract
[...] In this case, there would be no causal relationship between accident-damage, so no compensation. The problem of imputation is not different from causalityis common law. One can therefore refer to the solutions adopted by case law within the framework of common law. There is, however, a limit: from the point of view of evidence, common law is excluded. This means that the proof of causality, and that the accident is the cause of the damage, is presumed. While in common law, it is up to the victim to prove causality. [...]
[...] This is why, jurisprudence has created the responsibility in solidum. When several people are responsible for the facts, they can be so on the basis of faults, or another generating fact. Co-authors are held in solidum towards the victim, they are jointly responsible for the entirety of a damage. The victim can ask thea any of'between them the full repair of the prejudice she has suffered, without the latter being able to oppose her the participation of third parties/co-authors. However, the draft bill assigns joint and several liability to article 1265 but we must distinguish the debt obligation of the contribution to the debt: ? [...]
[...] If the acquirer is in bad faith, the Civil Code sanctions the acquirer by extending the obligation of restitution, for the purpose of sanction. Thus s'it s'it is a sum of money, he must also return the interest, he must return the fruits of the thing and must indemnify in case of destruction of the thing in cases of force majeure. SECTION Unjustified enrichment/Unjustified enrichment He responded to limited hypotheses and only provided by the Civil Code, which were nothing other than the repetition of the indu and the management of affairs. [...]
[...] This causes him a prisjudgment. If one estimates that this prisjudice s'islisve à 150? the user will only need to return 150?. Second step of jurisprudence: the rules have been unifyit is the 17 fFebruary 2010 (1there civile) from the Indo-objective. In other words, 'the absence of fault is not a condition for the implementation of the repeated action, but if this fault causes damage to the acquirer, damages and interest may be deducted from the repeated amount». According to Article 1302-2 paragraph 2 of the Civil Code states that «the restitution may be reduced if the payment results from a fault» L'order of 10 fApril 2016 entrine the jurisprudence, art 1202-3 new of the CC, the restitution may be reduced if the payment results from a fault. [...]
[...] We cannot therefore leave the victims alone to face the potential authors of the accident, we must put in place a more favorable compensation regime. This law operates an important break for common law, following the arrestt Desmares The goal is no longer necessarily the search for a responsible person in the strict sense of the term, namely the search for the causal fact; but rather a debtor of compensation, la solvabilityis: so we are also looking for the insurer. A such responsibilitygime n'would not have been put in place without a mandatory insurance system. Extracontractual liability and insurance law go hand in hand. [...]
