"Balancing Liberation and Alienation: The Role of Connected Health Tools in Modern Medicine"
Download
Read an extract
Themes
Connected Health, telemedicine, patient autonomy, medical technology, regulatory authorities, healthcare, liberation, alienation, personalized medicine
Reader
Abstract
Contents
Extract
of 2
Abstract
Discover the dual impact of connected health tools on patients and practitioners, offering liberation through autonomy and efficiency, yet risking alienation with excessive use. Learn how these revolutionary technologies, including telemedicine, can enhance medical care while maintaining the crucial role of healthcare professionals. Understand the need for balanced regulation to maximize benefits and minimize risks, ensuring connected health tools serve as a decisive aid rather than a replacement for personalized medical attention.
Contents
Certain advantages for the patient and the practitioner
A risk of counterproductive alienation
Certain advantages for the patient and the practitioner
A risk of counterproductive alienation
Get this table of contents for free after login.
Extract
[...] Therefore, these tools can constitute a true advancement in medicine. However, these tools cannot be used in a recurring manner and without the collaboration of the doctor. In fact, these tools cannot cannot in any way replace a medical treatment, a diagnosis or a personalized follow-up. Therefore, these tools constitute simply a decisive aid for doctors: their too frequent use constituting a true alienation. Thus, if connected tools cannot be considered alienating in the sense that the technology related to these tools can allow a real advancement in the field of medicine and in the daily work of the practitioner, their excessive and unconsidered use would lead to alienation towards the machine. [...]
[...] Connected Health Tools, Liberation or Alienation? As we have been able to notice, connected health tools have truly developed over the past few years in order to correspond to means of addressing health-related issues, particularly for athletes, in a more efficient and autonomous manner. However, if connected health tools seem to constitute a true liberation - both for the practitioner and for the patient - in the sense that they allow for greater autonomy, particularly through the use of telecommuting, for example, it is nonetheless necessary not to forget the limits of a recurring use of these tools. [...]
