Abstract
The striking and massive waves of harms that are threatening the society explain and justify a radical change in our scheme of civil liberties. Generally speaking, people are ready to sacrify a part of their rights and liberties in order to improve their physical security. The main issue is that this diminution in liberty often doesn't work out that way. Indeed, the new balance between security and liberty often only affects a specific part of the population. Consequently, is it accurate to sacrify the civil liberties of the minority in order to preserve the security of the majority?
