Civil liability, delictual liability, personal fact, fault, subjective fault, objective fault, damage, victim protection, Civil Code, Articles 1240, 1241
The personal fact is a fundamental element in civil delictual liability, implying that individuals must repair damages they have caused. This liability has evolved from a subjective fault to a more objective conception.
[...] The jurisprudence, notably through the judgments Lemaire and Derguini since 1984, gradually expanded this approach to a fault more objective, allowing to hold a person responsible even in the absence of full awareness of the risk. This evolution reflects a balance reinforced between the protection of victims and the responsibility of authors, showing that the law of liability civil law'adapted to social requirements and to the needscessitis of réparation. [...]
[...] To what extent does the personal fact remain the main foundation of civil liability, while adapting to the current requirements of reparation? Civil Law Dissertation In society, each individual must answer for the consequences of their actions: this is the heart of civil liability. It is based on three essential conditions: damage, a causal link, and a generating event. The latter constitutes the legal cause of the obligation to repair and can take three forms: personal act, the act of another, or the act of things. [...]
[...] Thus, while theon considertraditionally considered the discernment of the author as essential, the Court of Cassation has gradually introduced a more objective approach, favoring the protection of victims The jurisprudential evolution: from a subjective fault to an objective fault Traditionally, the responsibility civil ofdelictual liability rested on the subjective fault, that is to say that the author of a damage was held responsible only if he had the capacityis of discernment and, if applicable, the intention to commit the damage. In the absence of discernment, no liability could be engaged. [...]
[...] Similarly, the fait exclusif d'un tiers or of the victim she herself can eliminate the author's liability, since there is then no longer a direct causal link between her behavior and the damage. It may happen that the author's liability is only shared. This is the case when the fault of the victim a contributeis at the realization of the damage: its indemnification may be reduced in proportion to its share of responsibility. We find the same logic in the presence of a fact of a third party here intervenes concurrently with the author. The jurisprudence has played a decisive role in this matterhere. [...]
[...] It'agira of knowing to what extent personal fact remains the main foundation of responsibility civil ofdelictual, while adapting to the current requirements of repair ? We will thus see that personal fact imposes itself as the classical foundation of liability for fault before analyzing the limits and evolutions that have progressively modified its scope (II). The personal fact as the classical foundation of civil delictual liability The personal fact constitutes a fundamental element in civil liability, delictual, in fact, it implies that each one must repair the damages they have caused. However, for this civil liability to be engaged, several conditions must be met. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee