French Constitution, right to amend, parliamentary debates, Constitutional Council, legislative process, parliamentary groups, opposition rights, minority groups, Article 40, Article 41, Article 45
Reader
Abstract
Extract
of 5
Abstract
The right to amend in the French Parliament is governed by constitutional provisions and has been subject to various interpretations and challenges.
Extract
[...] This mechanism aims to impose a fixed speaking time for each parliamentary group. Thus hours are distributed among the different parliamentary groups, proportionally to the number of seats they hold. The parliamentary groups are free to use this time as they wish, once the allotted time is up, the amendments are submitted to a vote without possible debate. This procedure is not used by the Senate but is included in the National Assembly's regulation. The Constitutional Council has ruled on the implementation of this provision, considering that the proposed procedural changes only affect the duration of interventions, without restricting the constitutional right of amendment of deputies (2006-537 DC). [...]
[...] The constitutional revision of March would have been a great opportunity to introduce certain devices. It is unlikely that this will occur given the place of Parliament in the legislative process and in the constitutional revision procedure, it would not be in its interest to restrict its own rights, even if one wanted to restore a certain objectivity in parliamentary debates. [...]
[...] The goal is to reduce obstacles to the smooth conduct of parliamentary debates by passing through the path of consensus. Another improvement should be noted, the resolution of the National Assembly's rules of procedure provides for a deadline for tabling an amendment. Previously, amendments were tabled without any time limit, leading to a pile-up of amendments that deputies discovered in the hemicycle. Thus, Article 36 of the said resolution proposes a deadline beyond which deputies could no longer propose amendments. [...]
[...] The consequence of enshrining this right is not to abuse it, it is the ""corollary of legislative initiative » to use the terms of the Constitutional Council1. Abusive amendments are a threat to the smooth conduct of legislative action by slowing down parliamentary debates. Today more than ever, the National Assembly is distinguished by the abuse of the right to amend by parliamentarians. The Constitutional Council reminded us on August that respect for the right to amend is a component of the smooth conduct of democratic debate, it must therefore not be subject to enclaves (Constitutional Council, n°2025-891 DC). I. [...]
[...] Next, the most fundamental thing would surely be to institute a form of parliamentary responsibility. The current sanctions have only a relative scope, whether in time or in the weight of the group. More significant and weightier sanctions would already have a deterrent effect: for example, a tax on a minimum number of amendments over 6 months. Parliamentary action should not be prohibited, that is not the goal; we wish to cover obstructionist behaviors that deliberately paralyze the functioning of institutions. [...]
