Why we exist in the third dimension and why all other dimensions are moot in terms of viability
Download
Read an extract
Themes
Quantum physics, universe, 3D Three Dimensions, reality, 4D Fourth Dimension, space time, electromagnetism, gravity, spatial dimensions, theory of relativity, law of the inverse of squares, viability
Reader
Abstract
Extract
of 6
Abstract
The universe appears to arrive in our eyes as separations of matter and space orchestrated by the causal flow of time, where each of these things appears totally separate and with their own secrets of initiation into reality. Where did any of it come from? Why does it exist? And why are there so many colourful manners of distinctions? Why certain amounts of space, time and matter or anything?
Extract
[...] Powell, Richard E. (1968). "The five equivalent d orbitals". Journal of Chemical Education 45. Szabo, Attila (1969). "Contour diagrams for relativistic orbitals". Journal of Chemical Education 678. [...]
[...] Whereas spatial coordination and speeds of objects are pretty much moot. However, the universe can be a single flashing point as such but this would perhaps require more predicaments to also take place for it to actually be reality's totality. Hence, not the most viable dimension of reality. In one dimension: there is only a two-way option of motion, say a left and right spread for particles or matter or space to exist and to move about in. There is no way however of discerning motion as there is no thickness of an object nor hue nor any way of detecting any object's lengths away from each other without leaping into higher dimensions. [...]
[...] The true and accurate number of spatial dimensions to go by is the three dimensions of reality we find ourselves in only because that is when so far, any certainty, accuracy and truth of measure and observation has not come across absurdities, nor misappropriation of causes and effect and of interactions of particles and their motions. References S. Carlip, Lectures on two plus one-dimensional gravity. 1995 (arXiv:gr-qc/9503024v Mar 1995) Friedman (1964). "The shapes of the f orbitals". Journal of Chemical Education 354. [...]
[...] Why we exist in the third dimension and why all other dimensions are moot in terms of viability Abstract On the concept of dimensionality of reality there is a multiplicity of dimensions. However, the third dimension appears to stand out the most in terms of viability to host reality and be logically sound in its construction. This article demonstrates how less than two dimensions or how four or more dimensions does not result in a viable reality that obeys logic and where conservation laws persist without which reality has no standing or bearings. [...]
[...] Now, if there was a fourth object that moves in conjunction with the other three in a fourth spatial dimension, then it could create the illusion that the mountain is indeed shrinking even as you head closer and closer towards it, however this fourth object and dimension can also act in opposition by making it so that the mountain appears to enlarge as you move away from it. The fourth object and dimension can also make it so one of the four is moving backwards when really it is moving forwards or vice versa by moving opposite in conjunction to the other three objects in three spatial dimensions giving rise to absurd outcomes. Furthermore, any motion, signal or interaction can be demonstrated to apply in reverse with four spatial dimensions as the four dimensions are in interplay. [...]
