The New Spirit of Capitalism: Critique of a System in Crisis - Analysis by Luc Boltanski and Ève Chiapello
Download
Read an extract
Themes
Capitalism critique, social critique, artistic critique, Luc Boltanski, Eve Chiapello, worker insecurity, autonomy, freedom, corporate control, economic instability
Reader
Abstract
Extract
of 3
Abstract
The New Spirit of Capitalism, a seminal work by Luc Boltanski and Ève Chiapello, explores the intricate dynamics between capitalism and social critique. Published in 1999, this insightful analysis delves into the paradoxical nature of capitalism, which, despite its ability to adapt to crises through internal reforms, remains inherently unstable due to its relentless pursuit of profit. The authors examine the convergence of social and artistic critiques that emerged during the 1968 protests, where students and workers united against a system that exploited their energy, creativity, and aspirations. By highlighting the tension between capitalism's promise of autonomy and freedom and its reality of control and disconnection, Boltanski and Chiapello shed light on the inherent contradictions of the capitalist system. This thought-provoking work reveals how the system's attempts to maintain control through increased surveillance and evaluation ultimately lead to its own rigidity and loss of flexibility. As a result, workers are left facing insecurity and instability, trapped in a never-ending cycle of precariousness. The New Spirit of Capitalism offers a nuanced understanding of the universal quest for freedom and autonomy, making it a crucial read for those seeking to comprehend the complexities of modern capitalism.
Extract
[...] Because by chasing after money, capitalism has completely forgotten about individuals, their needs, their aspirations. And you know what? They were right to throw everything in the air for that. Because at the end of the day, we don't just want to survive, we want to live with a big and that's exactly what they were demanding. We're no longer just talking about terrible working conditions, but about total disillusionment: alienation, dehumanization, loss of meaning. It's as if capitalism is turning everyone into robots, without soul or creativity. [...]
[...] What we see is a real rejection of a system that accumulates inequalities. And when we talk about May 68, it's not just about strikes or barricades in the streets, it's a demand, a cry for + justice and dignity. The criticism, whether social or artistic, it puts forward a very simple thing: people were fed up with being taken for pawns in a huge machine where only the bosses get rich. What I like is the idea that even artists got involved in the fight. [...]
[...] There's this desire to break the codes, to rediscover a form of humanity that escapes the tyranny of assembly-line work and authoritarian power. This criticism, whether social or artistic, always seeks to remind us that we deserve better than to be reduced to mere cogs in a machine. It demands more autonomy, more power to decide our own lives. But 68, that's a bit like the collective cry of the heart: 'Let us breathe, let us live ' And at the end of the day, it's not just about existing to serve a system, but finding a genuine form of expression, power over one's life. [...]
[...] It's the great paradox: a system supposed to be based on "freedom" (economic, at least) ends up becoming a prison for those who make it work. Experts can organize meetings and endless debates, but in the end, it's always the same problem that repeats itself: a system in constant tension, unable to reform itself radically because, simply, the very foundations of this system (the quest for profit at all costs) condemn it to instability. - So, yes, capitalism is resilient but it is also, in a sense, self-destructive. [...]
[...] In this excerpt, it's the way he describes the disorganization of capitalism as a response to its own crisis. Here, we see a kind of central paradox: on the one hand, capitalism is able to adapt to crises through internal reforms, such as this meeting of corporate experts who are trying to understand why the system no longer works as it used to. But on the other hand, these reforms themselves show the limits of capitalism. They reveal that, despite all efforts to stabilize the system, it remains fundamentally unstable. [...]
