Management approaches, organizational performance, collaborative management, employee involvement, agility, flexibility, resistance to change, stress, innovation, human resource management, HRM
This document analyzes the evolution of management approaches and their impact on organizational performance and structure, highlighting both positive and negative effects.
[...] For example, the practice of telecommuting, although beneficial, can eventually encroach on family time. For the last two points, IBM is a notable example. In fact, the company had adopted a collaborative management approach that included virtual teams and remote work. Unfortunately, it did not work well and instead created stress and professional burnout.7. Conclusion The last few decades have been marked by a remarkable evolution of management in companies. This evolution was dictated by the need to maintain and improve the performance of companies in a constantly changing and increasingly competitive environment. [...]
[...] Considering this context, we define our problem as follows: « How has the evolution of management approaches over the past few decades influenced the performance and structure of organizations? To provide a nearly exhaustive response to this problem, we will first analyze the challenges and positive impacts induced by the evolution of management approaches, and on the other hand, we will analyze the challenges and negative impacts that the evolution of these management approaches has generated, whether on the performance of companies or on their structures. [...]
[...] With participative management, employees are encouraged to propose improvements that lead to significant added value in terms of quality and efficiency. Participative management integrates employee feedback and suggestions into the decision-making process, which transforms the company culture and leads to improved operations. The example of Monoprix, a French company, is significant. The latter has set up a method for evaluating managers by their teams, and this has borne fruit3. -Talent retention Collaborative management encourages collaboration and therefore develops camaraderie within teams. [...]
[...] -Collaborative management can induce conflicts within a work group. Collaborative management may not be suitable in a team where employees have different personalities, temperaments, or traits. When this is the case, conflicts due to divergent opinions between team members can erupt and persist. This mainly results in difficulties in coordinating each person's efforts. Marissa Mayer had introduced a rating system at Yahoo that was not well received6. -Collaborative management can induce a strong dependence Indeed, when many people are involved in a team, it can result in a slowdown or simply underperformance when the most enterprising employees who have the brightest ideas are absent. [...]
[...] How has the evolution of management approaches over the past few decades influenced the performance and structure of organizations? EU FPG001; Introduction to Management and Human Resource Management (HRM) Subject: Over the past few decades, management approaches have been evolving, always in search of performance. After presenting this context, you will present these different approaches in terms of challenges and impacts on the functioning and management of companies. Plan of the dissertation : - an introduction (contextualization, problematization, announcement of the plan) - a development in 2 parts (thesis and antithesis) - a conclusion that leads to an opening Introduction Over the past few decades, corporate management has undergone a marked evolution characterized by several notable phases. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee