Abstract
With increasing globalization, multinational corporations are gaining influence in conflict-affected regions. This expansion presents both economic opportunities and risks. While these companies can stimulate economic development and create jobs, their presence can also exacerbate tensions and lead to human rights violations. This issue raises important questions about corporate responsibility, particularly in terms of ethics and social justice. It is essential to determine the extent to which companies should be held accountable for their actions in these contexts.
Extract
[...] 860-886. - Roth, B. (2021). "The limits of soft law: Can the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights effectively regulate corporate conduct?" The American Journal of International Law 105.2. pp. 343-378. - Sarandrea, L. (2022). "Business and human rights in armed conflict: Navigating the legal and ethical landscape." UNDP. - Simpson, J. (2012). "The state and business: Rethinking corporate responsibility for human rights." Journal of Business Ethics 108.1. pp. 1-10. - Wood, A. [...]
[...] Can (and should) corporations be held accountable for human rights abuses in conflict? Introduction With increasing globalization, multinational corporations are gaining influence in conflict regions. This expansion presents both economic opportunities and risks. While these companies can stimulate economic development and create jobs, their presence can also exacerbate tensions and lead to human rights violations. This issue raises major questions about corporate responsibility, particularly in terms of ethics and social justice. It is crucial to consider to what extent companies should be held accountable for their actions in these contexts. [...]
[...] Thus, corporate responsibility for human rights violations in conflict zones is a challenge that necessitates a global and coordinated response. To suggest other avenues to explore regarding this study, we can "dissect" this research by location (continent or country) or by the sectors of the companies involved. It could indeed be interesting to perform statistics. Bibliography Scientific articles - Gereffi, G., et al. (2005). "The global value chain." The handbook of economic globalization. pp. 37-60. - Gomez-Lopez, A. (2010). "Toward a global standard for corporate responsibility for human rights abuses." Harvard Law Review. [...]
[...] pp. 1013-1071. - John Gerard, R. (2007). "Business and human rights: The evolving international agenda." Harvard University pp. 7-40. - Muttitt, J. (2012). "The business and human rights regime: A critical assessment." Human Rights Law Review 10.2. pp. 243-270. - Roffe, P. (2012). "The mirage of corporate accountability for human rights abuses: A critical assessment of the UN Guiding Principles." Human Rights Law Journal 33.4. pp. [...]
[...] This involves proactive measures such as risk assessments, implementing internal policies, employee training, and continuous monitoring of operations. The United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights stipulate that companies must avoid causing or contributing to adverse human rights impacts and address these impacts when they occur. By not adhering to these principles, companies can be held complicit in human rights violations, even if they are not the direct perpetrators of the abuses. Implementing due diligence is a moral obligation and can also protect companies against legal and reputational risks. [...]
