Conditions for Durable Israeli-Palestinian Peace

Extract

[...] As we conclude this conference dedicated to the conditions of a durable peace between Israel and Palestine, I invite you to take these proposals beyond the walls of this room, to defend them with conviction and to work tirelessly for their realization. Together, we can be the architects of a future where Israelis and Palestinians share the sacred soil of this land in dignity and mutual respect. I thank you for your unwavering commitment to this noble cause and for your willingness to contribute to a more just and peaceful world. Thank you. [...]

[...] The conference thus aims to create a framework for peace negotiations that are balanced, fair, and in line with international norms, while recognizing the political and social realities of the conflict. The goal is to achieve a lasting peace that respects the aspirations of both peoples for self-determination and peaceful coexistence, based on dialogue, mutual respect, and international cooperation. It is with this spirit that the following proposals, the fruit of a thorough reflection and a rigorous commitment to peace and justice, have been developed. Mutual recognition is an essential prerequisite for achieving a lasting peace in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. [...]

[...] This latter consideration ensures that decisions are made on the basis of a common understanding of the facts and issues. In the context of these negotiations, the requirement for impartial mediation is essential. It involves the intervention of a neutral third party who facilitates negotiations between the parties in conflict, by seeking to find common ground without taking sides with either party. Mediation should focus on the needs and concerns of each party, rather than on often rigid and intransigent positions. This makes it possible to discover common interests and work towards mutually beneficial solutions. [...]

[...] Resolution 242 calls for the withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from occupied territories during the 1967 conflict and emphasizes the need to respect the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and political independence of each state in the region. Resolution 338, on the other hand, demands an immediate cessation of all military activities and the opening of negotiations to establish a just and durable peace. It is on this solid foundation that constructive and viable proposals can be developed to bring an end to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. [...]

[...] In the same vein, unconditional respect for human rights and international humanitarian law is imperative for any proposal aimed at resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. To this end, it is essential that proposals be developed with a deep consideration for human dignity and the well-being of the affected populations. It is also recommended to provide for implementation and monitoring mechanisms for the resolutions. From this perspective, interim agreements should be put in place. Interim agreements must be seen as progressive milestones that guide the parties towards long-term objectives. [...]