Climate change, global warming, Paris Accords, sustainable development, environmental policy, greenhouse gas emissions, climate action, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change UNFCCC
Reader
Abstract
Extract
of 2
Abstract
Explore the remaining impact and legacy of the 2016 Paris Climate Agreement, ten years after its signing.
Extract
[...] What is the legacy of the 2016 Paris Accords, ten years after their signing? - Detailed Plan What remains of the Paris Climate Agreement? [...]
[...] Promises partially respected by the signatory states Insufficient progress towards the goals to be achieved - The 10 years that followed the agreement are the 10 warmest years since 1850 - There were no real brakes on CO2 emissions nor on the use of fossil energies - We need to question the real possibility of achieving certain goals such as the will to prevent warming by +1.5°C Financial efforts unable to reduce North / South disparities - Article 9 of the Paris Agreement stipulates thatthe developed countries provide financial resources to help developing countries» - The amount of the sums is not determined in the agreement, so states have complete freedom to choose the budget allocated to this goal - With the election and re-election of Donald Trump, known for his climate-sceptical positions, the United States withdrew from the Paris Agreement and no longer participates in this funding - COP29 failed to gather sufficient funds for environmental transition II) A regulatory arsenal weakened by the global political context Legal norms subject to national political wills - Weak legal obligations - An agreement that, like any international law standard, remains dependent on the consent of states to respect it - The agreement often refers the participation of states to their own national policy An agreement historically relegated to the background in a context of geopolitical and economic tensions - A multiplication of conflicts in the world that leads to putting the subject of the environment in the background - The economic context often justifies the absence of environmental policy - We also see an increase in conspiracy theories and climate skepticism that does not encourage States to commit to the environment. [...]
