Based on 4 pieces of information, what dangers do you think all this can cause for social and political debates in particular, and for society and democracy in general?
Télécharger
Lire un extrait
Thèmes abordés
Social media, misinformation, algorithm, echo chamber, confirmation bias, democracy, critical thinking, polarization, disinformation, Brexit, political debate, source of information, social networks, knowledge, opinion, anglais, expression écrite
Lecture
Résumé
Sommaire
Extraits
sur 2
Résumé du document
Based on these 4 pieces of information: 1. People prefer to get information on social networks. 2. People are more influenced by subjective experiences than facts. 3. People tend to favor sources of information that support their prior opinions. 4. The illusion of knowledge. What dangers do you think all this can cause for social and political debates in particular, and for society and democracy in general?
Sommaire
Information bubbles and echo chambers
The spread of misinformation
Information bubbles and echo chambers
The spread of misinformation
Accédez gratuitement au plan de ce document en vous connectant.
Extraits
[...] Based on 4 pieces of information, what dangers do you think all this can cause for social and political debates in particular, and for society and democracy in general? First, research has shown that people generally prefer to get information on social networks. Indeed, according to a 2016 survey of internet users would rather read articles shared by their friends on social networks. Yet, social networks tend to favor subjective experiences and sources of information that align with people's preexisting opinions, because the content displayed in users' feeds is determined by algorithms that promote engagement. [...]
[...] On the contrary, the phenomena described earlier lead to an increasingly polarized society, and to a rejection of facts in favor of subjective experience and opinions. The spread of misinformation on social media can be very harmful, as evidenced during the Covid-19 pandemic: false information about vaccines and remedies spread rapidly on social media platforms, leading people to doubt governments and scientists, and thus aggravating the threat. Disinformation is a danger for democracy, and the notion that truth can become subjective is particularly alarming because it undermines democratic processes and the stability of society at large. [...]
[...] All these factors threaten social and political debates: rather than being exposed to diverse opinions that could broaden their perspectives and refine their prior opinions, people stick to what they already think and know. For example, social media created echo chambers that contributed to polarizing the Brexit debate in the United Kingdom. Supporters and opponents of Brexit often found themselves interacting with like-minded individuals on social media, and exposed to content that reinforced their position. Besides, when people rely solely on social media for information, they experience a loss of discernment, leading to a blurred distinction between official and scientific sources, and personal opinions or unverified facts. [...]
